PANA

A
P
R
I
L

dot
2
0
0
4

 

Recently The South Coast Beacon published an editorial that berated our city and county elected officials for the dearth of workforce housing available on the South Coast. Although admitting that “we can’t build our way out of this crisis and not a single person is asking to do so” the editorial complained that developers, poised to construct 3,000 employee-housing units, are unable to do so due to an “anti-business mindset” that is “shortsighted” and “disingenuous”.

PANA encourages a balanced approach to growth in our community and we believe that when you look behind the headlines there is ample evidence that our community is accomplishing much more than many people acknowledge. For example -

  • Just now reaching completion is Maravilla, the 363 unit senior housing community located on Calle Real which promises to provide much needed housing for seniors in our community.
  • Willow Springs, built last year, is a 235-unit apartment complex located on Los Carneros Way. It is Goleta’s largest apartment complex and is providing affordable housing for our workforce.
  • In the application process in the City of Goleta is Bermant Development Corporation’s Villages at Los Carneros project (264 units), La Sumida Gardens Apartments on Hollister in old town Goleta (200 units), the Old Town Condos (36 units) as part of a hotel complex in old town, Comstock’s Ali d’Oro proposed project of 76 homes on the Ellwood Mesa in western Goleta, and perhaps the 109 units of the Sandpiper project pending the outcome of a lawsuit.
  • On the drawing boards for eastern Goleta are the MTD property (400 units), the Noel Christmas Tree Farm (135 units), a Turnpike-area mixed-use project (30 units), and perhaps the development of the School District of Santa Barbara’s 23- acre property near the Turnpike shopping center with up to 200 units.
  • Planned in the UCSB area: the Ocean Meadows project (56 units) on the northern edge of the golf course and UCSB faculty homes (236 units) on Canon Green near Phelps, faculty and family student housing units (151units) on Storke and Whittier Drive, and the San Clemente student housing on El Colegio (976 beds).
  • In addition, there are about another 100 units planned or in construction throughout Goleta and Isla Vista in small subdivisions and single family homes.

Housing for seniors, housing for students, rental apartments, single family homes - a wide variety of housing is being built or will be built in our area in the near future. Headlines berating the progress being made miss the mark and contribute little to the community dialogue about this topic.

Housing at UCSB
In early March UC Santa Barbara kicked off efforts to create a long range Housing Master Plan by hosting a series of workshops. With the help of a design consultant, the University is beginning to develop potential housing layouts for Faculty, Student and Staff housing concepts.

Focusing on land the University currently owns, preliminary discussion indicates that planning will proceed to explore ways to build 3,000 to 5,000 units of housing. The types of housing would likely range from dormitories to single family homes.
It is intriguing to imagine the possibilities such a large number of units might mean for their potentially positive impacts on traffic congestion and relieving pressure on the community to rezone agricultural and open spaces for housing. The design team has promised to post information about the project on the web. When this occurs we will pass along the address to our readers.

The campus has expressed its intention to work closely with officials from the City of Goleta and the County of Santa Barbara on this plan. Close collaboration between the various affected jurisdictions will be key to the project’s overall success.

1118 North Patterson
The property owner of this location is proposing to build seven homes, two of which would be affordable housing rentals. Neighborhood concerns have been raised about the size, scale and bulk of some of the homes, and the effects of traffic and setbacks to the existing neighbors. PANA has met with the neighbors and the design team on several occasions and appreciates the property owner’s willingness to listen and respond to the neighbor’s concerns. The project has been before the county’s Board of Architectural Review which, at its last meeting, addressed some of the neighbor’s concerns. The project must go before the planning commission for a rezone because the property is currently zoned for agriculture.

Santa Barbara School District/Tatum Property
Located directly north of the San Marcos grower’s site at Hollister and S. San Marcos Road is a 23-acre parcel owned by the Santa Barbara School District. The district has begun the process of considering how best to maximize the value of this property which is currently zoned for housing. They recently received information from a non-profit developer about developing the property for housing for the school district’s teachers and administrative employees. While no development proposal has been set forth, the school learned about financing and other aspects of the development process. The developer suggested 162 housing units for this site, but the number of units is dependent upon how much money the district wants to make off the site.

The developer giving the presentation has experience developing other public entities’ land for housing, most recently the 900-housing units at Cal State Channel Islands. If the school district sells the property they can only use the proceeds for capital improvement projects. Under the proposal discussed by the non-profit, funds generated by the project via rents and ground leases would provide more flexibility for the school district and could be used for multiple district needs. Any development of this site will be subject to review by the county of Santa Barbara.

Noel Christmas Tree Farm
PANA has not received any recent updates from the land owner or the county regarding this property. The last proposal, the 11th, proposed 135 units to be built on the property.

MTD Property
When preliminary plans for building 400 units of housing on this 20-acre property located on Calle Real near Turnpike were first announced they generated much concern. Immediate questions focused on compatibility with adjacent neighborhoods, traffic impacts and lack of parking. Since then, neighbors’ concerns have been heightened by their inability to meet with MTD officials to learn more about the project. Public participation is an important aspect of any development proposal and PANA looks forward to meeting with officials of MTD or their developers to discuss this project in the near future.

Comstock Development (Ali d’Oro) on Ellwood Mesa
The community recently got a sense of what this proposed upscale housing development of 76 homes on a 36-acre portion of the existing Santa Barbara Shores Park is going to look like. The developer erected “story poles” so the City of Goleta’s Design Review Board could get a sense of the site planning for and the size, bulk and scale of the homes. To one member of the city’s Design Review Board, it was “breathtakingly different than anything that was imagined on paper- the houses are closer to the monarch groves than envisioned, the scale of the houses appeared oversized for the site, and important viewsheds both from the bluffs and Hollister would be impaired. For members of the community who have been actively involved in saving the bluffs, it was a difficult moment to encounter the reality of the proposed project yet knowing that the trade-off of the positioning of this housing development away from its previously considered site closer to the bluffs will preserve a much greater swath of the coastal plain.

This project is part of the Ellwood Devereux land-swap which moves the housing development away from the bluffs and onto the city of Goleta owned-property next to Hollister Ave. The relocation will result in a 2-mile-long open space preserve along the coastline from the Devereux Slough area in the east to the Sandpiper Golf Course in the west.

Recently released is the draft environmental impact report for the Comstock homes Development and the Ellwood Mesa Open Space Plan. It is available on line at http://www.ellwood-devereux.org/documents.asp.

Sandpiper Development
The developer filed a $32 million lawsuit last year against the City of Goleta following the City’s rejection of the 109-unit housing proposal called the Residences at Sandpiper. Recently, the judge hearing the case in Santa Barbara Superior Court found for the developer but the project has been appealed by the city of Goleta. Located at the very western end of Hollister Avenue, the project generated significant controversy with the Goleta City Council rejecting the project as a result of inadequately addressed site design concerns. The 109 unit development was approved by the county’s board of supervisors two weeks before the incorporation of the city of Goleta.

Bishop Ranch
Smack dab in the middle of western Goleta, owners of this 265-acre tract of undeveloped land are attempting to have the land rezoned for housing as part of the city’s general plan. The developer’s representative is actively involved in soliciting public opinion to gain community support for the proposed 1,500 units of housing and a 24-acre public park. The plan calls for apartments, various housing types, a seven-acre shopping center geared toward the neighborhood, a school site and public gardens and recreation areas. If approved, Calle Real will be extended through the property.

Housing Element Update
The deadline for the County of Santa Barbara to have updated the housing element was December 31, 2003. In an effort to respond to widespread concern about the potential impacts of the housing element and to retain eligibility to compete for State housing grants, the county has divided the update process into two parts. Phase I makes some minor policy changes to the document and commits the county to identifying 109 acres countywide to rezone for various density levels of housing. Rezoning efforts in the unincorporated area of Goleta would likely focus on the San Marcos Growers location on Hollister. PANA continues to maintain its stance that the update of the housing element does not require the rezoning of any agricultural or open space at this time. You can read the full text of PANA’s comments to the Board of Supervisors http://www.panaspeedbump.org/htmls/bos3-18-04.pdf.

The first of two public hearings has taken place with the 2nd one for scheduled for Monday March 29, at 4 PM which will be broadcast on GATV channel 20.

Phase II of the housing element, consideration of specific design guidelines and land rezones, will take place throughout 2004 and likely extend to 2005. These actions will be very important and we will keep you posted on their status as they are scheduled.

101 in Motion
Recently, the county kicked off a $1.4 million effort to explore solutions to current and future congestion on 101. The community’s participation is encouraged. Their website is www.101inMotion.com. Obviously PANA does not know what recommendations may result from this effort but the discussion will no doubt address widening 101 and the feasibility of light rail. If so, it might be useful for participants to study congestion in another coastal California area.

The I-5/805 interchange is in northern San Diego County. A series of projects scheduled to be concluded in 2007 will see the interchange grow to 23 lanes wide. It is acknowledged that these improvements will not decrease drive times, they merely hope to keep it from deteriorating further. Considerable public opposition to the expansion has been generated since Caltrans has conceded that the expansion will only move the traffic bottleneck elsewhere.

The bottleneck is expected to shift further north along I-5 so planning has begun on a $630 million project to expand this part of the freeway from 8 to 14 lanes. Forty-five homeowners associations have raised concerns about noise, fumes, and decreasing property values that may result from the expansion.

What is extremely interesting about this specific location and the attempts to grapple with congestion is that alongside it sits light rail. The means to commute into the City of San Diego currently exists and those stuck in traffic can see the commuter trains passing them. For whatever reason, light rail is not solving their congestion problems and building more lanes is, at best, maintaining the status quo.

Target
As all of you probably know, there has been much discussion about the possibility of a Target store being built on City of Santa Barbara land near the airport. The specific location proposed for the store presents some real dilemmas since the revenue generated by the store would benefit the City of Santa Barbara while the City of Goleta would shoulder the impact on its infrastructure. The discussion is further complicated when land use decisions are added to the mix. Is the use of this land by a large retailer whose employees typically earn low wages going to benefit our community or add further demands to build subsidized housing? Will it negatively impact other locally owned businesses?

This is an excellent example of the contradiction of the State’s tax system. Property taxes flow to the State and make building housing an expensive prospect for local jurisdictions. Revenue from commercial activities remain with the local jurisdiction and can be very attractive to cash-strapped cities. So, while the State makes it very clear that our number one priority is to build housing our tax structure encourages communities to do just the opposite.

In an effort to gain some consensus, the Santa Barbara City Council intends to open up the discussion in the next few weeks with the south coast community about what is the best use for this area.

Valley Voice
Since January, the Valley Voice has been publishing a monthly article by PANA that focuses on neighborhood issues. We appreciate the Valley Voice’s support of our efforts to give voice to the concerns for neighborhood compatibility and quality of life issues. Recent articles can be viewed at www.goletavalleyvoice.com. (Look in the archives section). The columns are also on our website: www.panaspeedbump.org

Third District Candidates
PANA is a non-partisan organization but we would like to thank candidates Brooks Firestone and John Buttny for meeting with the PANA board and sharing their thoughts on land use issues prior to the recent election. We appreciate the fact that both were willing to take time out of their busy schedules to do so. Congratulations to Mr. Firestone on his victory.

As always, PANA encourages your comments and questions. Please e-mail us at timschmidt@verizon.net or visit our website at www.panaspeedbump.org

Dutcher Design 2003