January 2003
In the Neighborhood
| Correction:
In the written newsletter, the photo credit for the
University Circle Open Space Recreation Equipment was
omitted. The photo was taken by
Emily Hart-Roberts |
The projected population growth and the need for additional
housing along the south coast is a widely discussed topic,
fostering many questions about "where are we going to put
all the houses." For the unincorporated Goleta Valley and
in the city of Goleta, Santa Barbara County Associations of
Government projects a 25% population increase by 2030. Local
and regional government policy makers and planners deal with
the need not only for more housing stock, but of being able
to provide sufficient affordable and work force housing. While
housing may get the headlines, it is also about an infrastructure
less and less able to accommodate all the growth. Increased
housing densities and household sizes, whether in new developments
or in older neighborhoods will affect the character of our
neighborhoods. More cars on neighborhood streets and greater
traffic congestion will also be part of the picture.
So, it is with these thoughts in mind that the neighbors
consider the implications for the Noel Christmas Tree Farm
housing project, located off N. Patterson Ave. In late November,
the county's Board of Architectural Review held a design review
session to look at various site plans for this 25 plus acre
property. While no design came out of the process, it gave
the 30 or so neighbors who attended the session an opportunity
to see planning considerations that go into a new development
and to get a look at what varying housing densities would
do to the site plan.
Here are some of the ideas proffered: zero lot lines, clustered
housing, town homes, smaller lots, mixed-use commercial -
possibly a day care center, denser lots close to Patterson
and the northern edge of the property. The plan for a creek-side
public park and direct access from Patterson to the development
remained a part of all the discussions. The developer says
that the next plan will incorporate more workforce housing
and provide three or four market segments of housing.
As of press time, no decision has been made to the number
of units, but you can bet by the discussions at the meeting
that the 95 units most recently proposed will be increased.
If you are interested in receiving notification information
about this project, please give your name and address to the
county planner in charge of the project. Ann Almay can be
reached as follows: Email anne@co.santa-barbara.ca.us
or phone 568-2053. The next step for this project is a rezone
of the property from agricultural to residential sometime
in the new year.
Patterson Packing: On December 12, 2002 Trudi Carey’s
Patterson Packing Project, located on 2.45 acres at the west
side of Patterson and just north of the freeway, was seen
for an in-progress review by the Board of Architectural Review.
This project will consist of one two-story and one three-story
building with mini-storage facilities and a fruit, vegetable
and flower stand operated by the Lane Family, which has fruit
and vegetable stand on Walnut Ave and one at the Thursday
Goleta Farmer's Market. The planning commission is expected
to review the project sometime in March.
University Circle Open Space Recreation
Equipment:

photo by Emily Hart-Roberts
www.emilyhart-roberts.com
Neighbors participating in the playground equipment drive
to replace outdated dilapidated playstructures with new equipment
which will meet current safety and ADA stardards have almost
reached their goal: only a few thousand dollars remains to
be collected before construction/purchase of new equipment
can begin. A new playground will not only provide a safe and
fun place for children to play off the increasingly busy streets
but will also revitalize the neighborhood. Won’t you consider
contributing to this effort which will benefit children for
decades. Please send your contribution to: Santa Barbara County
Parks Foundations, Attn: Richard Lindley, 610 Mission Canyon
Rd., Santa Barbara, CA 93105
ARCO Gas Station and Mini-Mart: The planning
commission’s August 28th decision to approve the ARCO gas
station and mini-mart at the northeast corner of Patterson
Ave. and Highway 101 exit has been appealed to the Board of
Supervisors. Let the Board of Supervisors know at their January
7, 2003 meeting that this project will be detrimental to the
neighborhood and the community which it is supposed to serve.
Here are the reasons:
Everyone who travels the Patterson Ave./Calle Real roadway
will be negatively impacted by this project and the traffic
it generates. Over 900 cars every day are projected to use
the gas station and mini-mart. During the noon and PM peak
hours, cars will either enter or exit the station every 20
seconds! This traffic will occur when the roadways are already
congested. There are no planned infrastructure changes to
improve traffic flow or make it less congested. Traffic congestion
at Calle Real and Patterson will continue to increase particularly
with the soon-to-be finished Maravilla and the two projects
described above yet to be built.
The site is inappropriate for a gas station. It is zoned
highway commercial, but the highway traveller can't see the
project from the freeway and can't get to and from it easily.
Sixty percent (60%) of the cars using the project will need
to make a U-turn at the already congested Calle Real/Patterson
intersection. There are many concerns about ingress and egress
through the one driveway, its proximity to the Patterson/101
off-ramp, and traffic backing-up from the gas station onto
Patterson and into the freeway exit.
The project will be a hindrance to the completion of the
Calle Real extension, one of the last missing links in providing
the community with a secondary route throughout the Goleta
Valley to reduce congestion on Highway 101.
The project will bring a high-volume, four-pump gas station
and a mini-mart open 19-hours a day, 7-days a week into a
solely residential neighborhood that is entirely free of any
evening commercial activities. The project's late night hours
will bring unwanted and unwelcome traffic to the neighborhood.
Simply stated, this project is not compatible with the neighborhood
nor conducive to the health, safety and welfare of our citizens
and our community. The City of Goleta, Citizens for Goleta
Valley, the Citizen's Planning Association, and PANA oppose
this project.
Let your supervisor, Susan Rose, know of your opposition
to this project: Call her: (568-2191); send her a fax (568-2283);
email her: srose@co.santa-barbara.ca.us;
or send her a letter at the following address: Susan Rose,
2nd District Supervisor, County of County of Santa Barbara,
105 E. Anapamu Street, Santa Barbara CA 93101.
The appeal hearing will take place Tuesday morning about
11 a.m., January 7th, 2003 in the Board of Supervisors hearing
room at the county administration building. Need more info,
call PANA hotline 692-9393.
Street Tree Replacement: Neighbors living on
Kellogg, Lyon Place, Pembroke, Stow Canyon, and Butte who
had sidewalk, curb, and gutter repair/replacement in early
2002 due to invasive tree roots will be getting replacement
trees in early 2003. The City of Goleta sent out letters to
all affected homeowners in December advising them of the procedures
for the street-tree replacement effort.
San Jose Creek Watershed Plan: San Jose Creek has
been selected by the County of Santa Barbara’s Project Clean
Water to serve as a pilot project for a watershed planning
effort. The plan is an opportunity for the community to develop
a blueprint for improving water quality, providing for flood
control protection, improving plant and animal habitat, and
coordinating local land use. The community is invited to attend
the next meeting on Thursday, January 16, 2003, 7 PM at the
Goleta Valley Community Center. For more info, log onto www.countyofsb.org/project_cleanwater
or call Darcy Aston at Project Cleanwater at 568-3546.
Sphere of Influence: (Quoted from the Dec13th edition
of the Valley Voice) The Committee for One plans to file a
request to place the land between the cities of Santa Barbara
and Goleta under the sphere of influence of the City of Santa
Barbara. "That means that the city (of Santa Barbara) will
have something to say about zoning mattters and so forth,"
said co-chair Harriett Phillips. The land would not be annexed
by the city of Santa Barbara at that point, and to outline
any future plans would be premature, Phillips said. However,
she called the action a first step toward an eventual annexation.
For more information, please call Harriett Phillips at 964-4905.
Last Newsletter: This will be the last printed
newsletter for the foreseeable future. The much greater press
coverage by the Valley Voice, the Beacon and the Santa Barbara
Newspress on all matters in the Goleta Valley has done a great
deal to keep the citizenry informed and current on local neighborhood
issues. Often times, there is even a generous give and take
in letters to the editor that is far more elaborative, informative,
and timely than this thrice yearly newsletter could ever hope
to be. Printing and distributing the newsletter has also become
cost-prohibitive. Last, with the advent of the city of Goleta,
the city council now considers and acts on neighborhood issues
(e.g., newspaper racks in the neighborhoods, garage conversions)
reducing the necessity for the neighborhood to take action.
Keep up to date: Even though you won't be reading about the
status of projects in a paper newsletter, PANA will still
keep tabs of current projects and activities in the neighborhood.
Visit PANA’s website: www.panaspeedbump.org or to receive
periodic email updates, send your email address to timschmidt@verizon.net.
Thank You: PANA supporters, neighborhood volunteers,
and concernced citizens. Your efforts are what make Goleta
such a great place to live.
On behalf of the board of directors of the Patterson Area
Neighborhoods Association: I wish you all a very happy and
healthy new year!
Cecilia Brown, President
Bud Sprague, treasurer
Richard Whited, secretary;
Jude Blau
Chris Harrison
|