September 2000
Agenda
Every Tuesday @ 9 AM
Board of Supervisors meets – on Channel 20.
Every Wednesday @ 9 AM
Planning Commission meets – on Channel 20.
Supervisor Rose holds open office hours from 4 to 6 PM twice
per month on the 2nd and 4th Thursdays. The 2nd is at Farmers
Market and the 4th is at her office.
Goleta Union School District Board – 1st & 3rd Wed. of each
month @ 7:30 PM.
Goleta Water District Board – 2nd & 4th Tues. of each month
at 7PM.
Goleta Sanitary District Board – 1st & 3rd Mon of each month
@ 7:30 PM.
Santa Barbara City Council – Every Tuesday at 2 and 6 PM.
Channel 18.
Hot Off the
Press
October
18 Meeting at Kellogg School
PANA rarely calls a meeting since we know how busy everyone
is. But it seems that once or twice a year important developments
warrant getting together to get your opinion. Now is such
a time, with two current developments being planned in the
heart of our neighborhoods.
1. Noel Christmas Tree Farm is planning to convert to housing.
Larry and Jackie Cavaletto will tell you what they have in
mind and ask for your input.
2. The “Albertsons site” south of Calle Real is being purchased
by Santa Barbara Airbus for a bus terminal.
PANA believes that these two projects will permanently affect
the character of our neighborhood and deserve our attention.
This is the one time – early in the process – where our ideas
have the most impact. You should attend even if your back
yard is blocks away.
Backyard Issues
Xmas Tree Farm – Noel Christmas Tree Farm is the largest
undeveloped parcel in the PANA area, 25 acres at 555 Las Perlas,
spanning all the way from Patterson Avenue to San Jose Creek.
Failing agriculture has caused the Cavalettos to begin planning
for future development of the parcel, which is surrounded
by single family housing on the South, condominiums on the
North, and the creek on the West. This parcel is zoned Agriculture
till 2003.
The Cavalettos have contacted PANA to learn how neighborhood
interests might be embraced. We have provided some broad guidance
on what we believe the neighbors might NOT want, such as high
density affordable housing or huge single family homes on
tiny lots. We also see no reason to encourage premature rezoning
from agriculture.
However, our most important suggestion was for PANA to host
a meeting allowing neighbors to provide direct and personal
input on their desires. We encourage all who have an interest
in their neighborhood to attend the gathering at the Kellogg
School auditorium on October 18 at 7 PM. NOW is the time,
early in the process, for comments to be productive. The Cavalettos
are listening and for that we should all be thankful.
Airbus – Santa Barbara Airbus has bought the site
South of Calle Real and West of Patterson, where the gas station
is. This site has been referred to as the “Albertsons site”
for the past 2 years (for the huge grocery that we all chased
away) and will soon be across the street from the Orchard
Park housing and the Maravilla on Calle Real.
Airbus has told PANA that they plan a complete transfer of
all their operations here. The plan is for a bus terminal,
offices for 35 employees, parking for 125 passengers and 25
buses, and operations from 4 AM to 2 AM. The County will need
to determine if the C-1 zone allows this use. Airbus will
probably argue that this use will generate a lot less traffic
than the huge grocery store or the proposals by JM. Others
will argue the noise and pollution are unacceptable. You should
provide your opinion at the meeting.
PANA was looking into whether the site could support some
beneficial use, such as a school, church, affordable housing,
or restaurant row (to replace Jaspers) – but this project
has surfaced before we finished.
Bridges – The University Drive bridge between Patterson
and Ribera is now under construction. This and the Fairview
Overpass will likely be completed BEFORE the widening of Calle
Real and San Jose Creek bridge, as a result of recent re-scheduling.
Maybe our attention to this issue helped.
Maravilla – The 369 unit senior housing project on
the North side of Calle Real has been to the Board of Architectural
Review (BAR) several times over the past months – always with
PANA present. The design now includes a fence extending all
the way from Calle Real to the fire station along San Jose
Creek and the Northern property line. This will prevent employee
parking in the neighborhoods to the North. The design of the
divided four lane Calle Real is final, and the landscaping
of the median will be very nice.
Fairview Shopping Center/Chevron Gas Station – You
probably noticed the abandoned Chevron gas station at Fairview
and Calle Real. The gas station looks abandoned, surrounded
by chain link, and will eventually sprout those pipes and
weeds that come with the environmental cleanup process. The
County has no rules requiring landscaping that hides the abandoned
station for the years that it may remain an eyesore. PANA
will press the shopping center for aesthetics. Do we need
to worry that the entire Fairview Center will soon look abandoned
as well? Jaspers has been gone for ¾ year, the gas station
has closed, and it seems quite likely that a new Walgreen’s
drug store on Calle Real could be the last straw for Rite
Aid. Vons shows no sign of the long anticipated expansion.
Leases are not being offered to some of the long-time small
businesses in the center. We hope the Fairview Center will
not be lost to poor management and the Big Box?
Neighborhood
Traffic Cop
Planning Commission Hearing – PANA has instigated
a County review of Goleta traffic congestion. On July 20 we
sent a letter to the Planning Commission which requested their
review of all aspects of traffic management in the area. A
few days latter the Commission voted to hold such a hearing,
but the date is not yet known.
We suggested that something could be improved since computer
traffic models are always wrong. Every projection of Patterson
area traffic 10 years into the future was realized within
2 years instead of 10. Trip factors are based upon traffic
surveys from Kansas and New Mexico, instead of here. Streets
and bridges are never closed or repaired in the computer model.
No more traffic signals are ever planned in the computer,
in spite of the fact that they are sprouting like weeds in
the real world.
We also asked for new developments to be subjected to reasonable
restrictions in their Conditions of Approval. Traffic fees
should reflect greater impacts from part time employees than
full time employees, and merely offering free bus passes should
not be accepted as eliminating all employee traffic. A mere
promise to avoid doing business during the rush hour should
not eliminate traffic or fees. We even wonder if it is time
for permits requiring that construction equipment be prohibited
from using the roads during rush hour. And should each contractor
be allowed to close any traffic lane on a whim during rush
hour?
The slowest growth rate in Goleta is growth in use of alternative
transportation. Should we only allow new development at the
same rate as the increased use of alternative transportation?
Stay tuned.
Community-wide
Issues
McDonalds Drive-thru – PANA has been in the forefront
of appealing the Planning Commission approval of a new drive-thru
at the Camino Real Marketplace, aka Big Box.
Six individual members of your PANA Board of Directors joined
twelve other individuals from all corners of the community,
and 6 other neighborhood organizations, in an appeal to the
Board of Supervisors. This drive-thru was denied by the Board
of Supervisors 3 years ago and the size of McDonalds was expanded
as compensation. We feel strongly that it would be wrong to
add the drive-thru now in an area so heavily impacted by congestion
and pollution. The air quality analysis used to justify this
drive-thru could set a dangerous precedent for all sorts of
other businesses if it is not defeated.
You can all be proud of the votes against the drive-thru
by the Planning Commissioners from our Goleta districts, Doreen
Farr and Lansing Duncan. It is unfortunate that others who
do not live here find it so easy to make decisions degrading
our community.
Affordable Housing – We cannot make room for all
who wish to live here without wholesale changes to the character
of our community.
There is little doubt that the most intensely debated topic
at present is that of affordable housing. While housing is
definitely not very affordable in Goleta, it is more affordable
here than anywhere else on the South Coast, as reported in
the News Press. Furthermore, Goleta has been the site of almost
ALL County affordable housing approvals in the past decade.
Will we allow our community to become the solution to affordability
needs for Montecito, Hope Ranch and Toro Canyon?
Right now, the County Planning Commission is holding a series
of hearings on a new Toro Canyon Community Plan. Unfortunately,
this plan and the EIR that supports it ignore impacts on areas
outside the boundaries. There is no agreement yet to include
affordable housing or schools. So this Toro Canyon plan can
impact both Carpinteria AND Goleta, and create another exclusive
enclave to boot.
Part of the problem for Goleta is that we are nearing 85%
of our planned community build-out capacity. The issues of
past over-development of job creating commercial space are
finally coming home to roost. Much of the remaining space
for housing all the new employees is in small parcels surrounded
by existing low-density neighborhoods. Those neighbors do
not want to suffer a dramatic change in the character of their
community to solve a problem for Toro Canyon residents or
those struggling to move here from LA.
The Christmas Tree farm is a relatively large example involving
25 agricultural acres into which some would squeeze 500 units.
The El Encanto apartment proposal is a relatively small example
involving only 1 commercial acre – but 18 units involving
3 stories. The Goleta neighborhood organizations are beginning
to work together to educate elected representatives of the
risks of ignoring their constituents opposition to a flood
of such projects in the wrong locations.
Unfortunately, past history should have us all worried.
Maravilla was approved, as was the Big Box, by a Board of
Supervisors that ALL lived elsewhere. This year Toro Canyon
may be turned into another enclave like Hope Ranch and next
year the same may happen to Santa Ynez. Will Goleta be the
dumping ground for all their affordable housing problems because
we have NO Supervisor living here and only ONE Planning Commissioner
living here? Not if we make our resolve crystal clear.
PANA wants to make sure you are alerted that a powerful minority
are plotting to change our zoning and community plans in order
to build housing for all who come here. They plan to prevent
ANY additional single family housing and ONLY approve affordable
housing.
When watching a Planning Commission hearing, it is possible
to figure out who represents the district from which the project
is coming. Every Commissioner scrutinizes a project that is
proposed for THEIR district at great length. This attitude
is demeaned as NIMBYism (Not In My Back Yard). Unfortunately,
when representatives come from far away to make “regional”
decisions, they seem to exhibit the other side of the NIMBY
coin all to frequently. The other side might be called an
A-OKAYY-BY (Anything’s OKAY in Your Back Yard).
PANA supports other neighborhoods in resistance to things
we would not want in our back yard. The next issue is a case
in point.
Greenhouses – Part of the Toro Canyon debate has been
over the continued expansion of greenhouse agriculture. They
already have 5.1 million square feet of greenhouses and the
plan is looking at another 2 million square feet. ONE Goleta
greenhouse operation is planning to add 1 million square feet
by converting over 25 acres of open-field agriculture to greenhouses
on South Patterson Avenue. This issue is coming to Goleta.
Modern greenhouse agriculture shares a great similarity to
manufacturing – with trucks delivering components to large
warehouses where assembly takes place, followed by shipment
of the product to remote distribution centers. Perhaps it
is not much of a stretch to think of greenhouse agriculture
as manufacturing that has few workers and little traffic impact
by comparison with R&D facilities.
Come to think of it, would we welcome a million square feet
of greenhouse agriculture to the Christmas Tree farm instead
of housing? We hope that you will understand why PANA becomes
involved in the McDonalds drive-thru, El Encanto apartments
and Toro Canyon greenhouses. We are NIMBYs but don’t want
to be A-OKAYY-Bys, because these same issues are going to
come up in our own neighborhood.
Development Fees – Some issues never go away. PANA
led the successful fight for development fees so that our
roads and parks would not continue to be overburdened by new
development that does not pay its way. A year ago the Supervisors
approved large increases in fees to improve roads and buy
park lands. This year they failed to raise these fees in proportion
to changing conditions, so just a year later our infrastructure
deficits are again increasing.
In effect, the County is saying that the cost of acquiring
new park land in Goleta only increased 3% over the past year
– in spite of newspaper reports of an 18% increase.
PANAspeedbump.org – Don’t forget to visit the PANA
web site weekly. We post letters to officials and developers
as they are sent. All the new issues show up here long before
we summarize them in the newsletter. You can e-mail us here
too, or directly at jackhawx@gte.net.
PANA Status
Report
THANK YOU. Recipients of Speed Bump have shown their outstanding
support with donations to keep us going. Well over 100 donations
have come in since the last newsletter. This means that PANA
now enjoys financial support from over 415 families in addition
to the 300 who have attended meetings on specific issues.
Speed Bump is distributed to over 3000 area addresses, so
as many as 10,000 people may see the Speed Bump as a direct
result of YOUR support. PANA’s area
is north of the freeway between Turnpike Road and Fairview
Avenue. Our considerable strength comes from you.
We Need You!
We need your contributions to continue our
newsletter distribution and to fight for your interests. When
you contribute to PANA, more of your neighbors learn what
is happening around our area. Please think of your contributions
as extending PANA’s reach – not just getting the newsletter
to yourself.
So many of you have been kind enough to help
in the past, that we have no plans to expand circulation further.
Some send a little each time, while some send a lot all at
once. Either works. But it may have been a year ago that you
last helped PANA with your contribution. Please consider helping
again – or joining in for the first time.
We hope you agree that our record of volunteer
effort and success in representing the Patterson Area Neighborhoods
speaks for itself. |